Closed meeting reasoning falls short

Terrace city council's private meeting with the Qinhuangdao, Chinese local government, is raises valid questions and concern.

The Terrace Standard editorial of December 16, 2015) was critical of city council’s decision to  discuss its decision to strike a friendship agreement with the   Qinhuangdao, China local government, behind closed doors.

I agreed with the editorial and was particularly disturbed by the explanations given by a council member to readers commenting on the editorial on the newspaper’s web page.

In response to one reader’s question asking “What are they hiding!!” the councillor explained “that council does not decide what is or isn’t public, those decisions are made by staff based on the [Community] charter.”

This explanation is as disturbing as the closed meeting itself.

The guiding principle for council meetings is that they “must be open to the public, except as provided in this Division” [sec. 89(1)]. The Charter lists five subjects where “a council meeting must be closed to the public” [sec. 90(2)].  A friendly exchange agreement with a foreign municipality does not fall within the range of these five subjects.

The Charter specifies fifteen subjects for which council may, at its discretion, close a meeting to the public [sec. 90(1)]. The decision to make use of that power and close a council meeting to the public is not made by staff; it can only be made by council. The procedure is standard for municipal councils throughout the province. An example is found in Terrace Council Minutes of Nov. 9/15, resolution #428:

“MOVED/SECONDED to move In-Camera and close the meeting to the public pursuant to Division 3, Sections 90(1) (a) & (k) of the Community Charter (to discuss matters relating to personnel and negotiations for Municipal services). Carried Unanimously.”

This resolution identifies the Community Charter sections which allow council to exclude the public from the meeting, and it describes the nature of the subjects to be considered. The In-Camera resolution is worded in that manner because the Community Charter’s guiding principle declares that council is “democratically elected, autonomous, responsible, and accountable” [sec. 1(1)(a)].  Two councillors (mover and seconder) proposed, in an open meeting and for the record, that council exercise its option to meet behind closed doors as authorized by the Charter “to discuss matters relating to personnel and negotiations for Municipal services.” Council adopted the motion by unanimous vote and proceeded accordingly. Staff recorded the proceedings.

After council has dealt with a matter In-Camera, the decision is reported to an open meeting. An example of that step is found in Terrace Council Minutes of Dec. 14/15, resolution #485:

“MOVED/SECONDED that the December 9, 2015, In-Camera Finance, Personnel and Administration Component of the Committee of the Whole Report be adopted with the following recommendation….” Then they present the recommendation in detail.

There is nothing apparent in the Qinhuangdao friendship agreement requiring an in camera meeting.

The minutes of council’s November 30, 2015 meeting did include this sentence: “Mayor Leclerc reported on the signing of the Friendly Exchange Agreement with Qinhuangdao, China.”

A review of Terrace Council meeting minutes makes it abundantly clear that everyone at City Hall, council and staff, knows how to conduct and record closed meetings and the decisions arising from such meetings. The councillor’s initial response to a Terrace Standard reader’s comment (that council does not decide what is or isn’t public) is nonsense. As if that was not enough yet, this councillor proceeded to further muddy the waters with a response to a second reader’s comment, expanding on his initial flummery with a reference to Charter “section 90(n)” (sic) which bears no relevance to the issue raised in the editorial or the two readers’ comments.

The Qinhuangdao meeting where the friendly exchange  agreement was signed was a social gathering, amounting to little more than a public relations puff. Why pretend otherwise? Why mislead citizens?

Retired public sector administrator Andre Carrel lives in Terrace, B.C.


Just Posted

College buys a yurt to boost student success

Round tent-like structure part of college instructional shift

Soup kitchen sees “groundswell of community support”

Donations toward looming tax bill push non-profit back in the black

Terrace husband and wife honoured for saving each other’s lives

BC Ambulance presented each a Vital Link Award for separate incidents of CPR

Council supports lobby for fair share of cannabis tax revenue

The City of Terrace is throwing its support behind a West Kelowna… Continue reading

Airport registers modest passenger increase

Manager anticipates further growth in 2018 as expansion project nears completion

Airport registers modest passenger increase

Manager anticipates further growth in 2018 as expansion project nears completion

RCMP nail sex toy thief

Shop owner plays a role in arrest

Ice-cream-eating bear draws controversy

An Alberta Wildlife Park posted a video this week of one of their bears going through a Dairy Queen drive-through

Fernie, RCMP go to court over city log books in fatal ammonia leak probe

Log books center stage in clashing of investigations between the city and RCMP

B.C.’s biggest pot plant planned for Oliver

Co-founder Tony Holler said the 700,000 sq. ft. facility would produce 100,000 kg of pot per year

High-end whisky seized in B.C. bar raids

Raids end in seizures at Victoria, Nanaimo and Vancouver whisky joints

Double-doubles and demonstrations: Employees rally outside Tim Hortons

Protests held in response to Ontario franchise owners cutting employee benefits and breaks

Train derails in Northwest B.C.

CN reports no injuries or dangerous goods involved after coal train derailment.

Las Vegas shooter acted alone, exact motive still undetermined: Sheriff

Stephen Paddock was behind the gunfire that killed 58 people including two Canadians

Most Read