JURY deliberations in Canada are kept secret.

Stephens jury decision reasons are kept private

The reasons the Terrace B.C. jury found him 'not guilty' of second degree murder may never be readily known.

THE REASONS why a jury of nine men and three women here found a local man not guilty of second degree murder may never be readily known.

That’s because compared to the American court system where jury members, once their duty is finished, are even known to take part in press conferences, the situation is much different in Canada.

All that’s known in the trial of Travis Stephens, charged with the 2013 second degree murder in the shooting death of Eric Cardinal, is that the jury spent the better part of three days from March 20 to March 22 deliberating that charge before finding him not guilty.

Those deliberations followed a week-long trial the previous week.

The same jury did find Stephens guilty of the attempted murder and aggravated assault of another individual connected to the same circumstances resulting in Cardinal’s death.

In the Canadian court system, whereas a judge may release the reasons for his or her  judgment, the jury deliberations are kept secret.

And jury members are bound by law not to speak to anyone about anything said in the jury room while deliberating.

“It’s a longstanding practice that jurors’ deliberations inside the room would be kept secret so there couldn’t be any public pressure put on them after they left the jury room [about their decision],” said University of Victoria law professor Gerry Ferguson in general comments.

“It seems to be a form of protecting them from any blowback.”

It’s also to not allow the jurors to be harassed, he added.

The problem with letting jury members express their opinions is that jurors might begin talking without putting sufficient thought into their words and it might sound like there was some undue influence or impropriety on the part of another juror, said Ferguson.

“So if the jurors spoke after the fact, it might provide some grounds for an appeal,” he said.

Another concern would be a misrepresentation of what was said or done.

But there are downsides to not allowing jurors to speak.

First of all, academics cannot study how the jurors made their decisions because they can’t do confidential studies of the jurors, said Ferguson.

The Canadian Criminal Code clearly states that it’s an offence to try to obtain information from a juror and an offence for them to disclose information, he added.

So there’s no way to find out how juries operate, what factors are important to them, if race or gender makes any difference and how significantly they treated the expert evidence, said Ferguson.

And another downside is that if the jurors did in fact act improperly for whatever reason, thee is virtually no way of knowing that unless some juror breaks silence and says other jurors seemed to be influenced by an issue or that they had enough of jury duty and wanted to be done and go home.

A judge can’t do anything about a jury’s decision but crown or defence counsel can appeal the jury’s decision although on appeal, they still can’t find out what the jury said or did, said Ferguson.

In appeal court, the only way to have a different outcome to a case is if the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of a conviction that no reasonable jury could’ve come to that decision; or for the lawyer to say the trial judge misdirected the jury on some important piece of the law or evidence during the jury instructions, said Ferguson.

“Whatever the verdict was in this case, if the judge is unhappy with it, he has nothing more to say or do other than he should thank the jury,” said Ferguson.

After the Stephens’ jury announced its decisions in the court late in the afternoon of March 22, Mister Justice Robert Punnett of the B.C. Supreme Court, the trial judge, did thank them and dismiss them.

Just Posted

Snow Valley Nordic Ski Club opens new fat bike and snowshoe trail

Created to improve safety for skiers, welcome more members

Council briefs: residents push city to keep bowling lanes open

Summary of council discussions from Dec. 9

Skeena Voices | No ocean to divide

Lillian Cui Garcia released a memoir reflecting on her life between the Philippines and Terrace

Terrace’s annual homeless count sees modest decrease

Though survey only captures snapshot in time

EDITORIAL: Nervous about the roundabout? I was too

The new roundabout at Hwy 16/Hwy 37 seems to be spinning everybody… Continue reading

VIDEO: Feds give update on flying clearance for Santa’s sled

Transport Minister Marc Garneau has this message for the country’s children

Investigators confirm three died in B.C. plane crash

Transport Canada provides information bulletin

Prime Minister sets 2025 timeline for plan to remove fish farms from B.C. waters

Foes heartened by plan to transition aquaculture found in Fisheries minister mandate letter

Canada’s Attorney General looking to larger reforms on doctor-assisted death

The Quebec Superior Court gave Ottawa just six months — until March 2020 — to amend the law

Navigating ‘fever phobia’: B.C. doctor gives tips on when a sick kid should get to the ER

Any temperature above 38 C is considered a fever, but not all cases warrant a trip to the hospital

Wagon wheels can now be any size: B.C. community scraps 52 obsolete bylaws

They include an old bylaw regulating public morals

Indigenous mother wins $20,000 racial discrimination case against Vancouver police

Vancouver Police Board ordered to pay $20,000 and create Indigenous-sensitivity training

Sentencing for B.C. father who murdered two young daughters starts Monday

The bodies of Aubrey, 4, and Chloe, 6, were found in Oak Bay father’s apartment Dec. 25, 2017

B.C. vet talks tips for winter travel with pets

Going to see the vet the day before a trip is never a good idea

Most Read