Use your ballot to reduce the risk of referendum skullduggery

Democratic governance requires more, a lot more, from citizens than periodically electing or re-electing representatives only to later blame them when something goes wrong. I have a bias in this regard which is likely reflected in my comments on the pending electoral reform referendum.

Referenda without a constitutional basis can be ambiguous. The local government level has such a basis in Community Charter section 180, where it states that “a loan authorization bylaw may only be adopted with the approval of the electors.” The Community Charter sets out the conditions and processes for securing that approval are in detail and without ambiguity.

When a government calls for a referendum without a constitutional basis, the rationale for the vote, the conditions under which it is to be held and the process to be followed, are all susceptible to political ruse and a self-serving slant. The results arising from such a referendum are inevitably open to interpretation. The vote, rather than yielding a clear democratic decision, runs the risk of deepening political divisions.

Great Britain’s June 23, 2016 referendum on the question of its membership in the European Union (Brexit vote) provides a textbook example. There was no constitutional basis for that vote. The question appeared to be unambiguous: “Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?” Voters were invited to check either the “Remain” or the “Leave” box on the ballot.

The government did not have a post-Brexit economic strategy. The purpose of the referendum was to put an end to political bickering. Not surprisingly the campaign was dominated by emotional propaganda. A majority of 51.89 percent voted to leave. Today, nearly two years after the vote, British society and politicians are embroiled in arguments about how to interpret the result and what the government ought to do with it. Divorce negotiations with the European Union are mired in confusion.

I am not suggesting that a referendum without a constitutional basis lacks legitimacy. I am suggesting that when governments call for a referendum for political reasons on a question within the government’s constitutional authority, the question put to citizens and the process are more important than the outcome of the vote.

The May 17, 2005, electoral reform referendum asked:

Should British Columbia change to the BC-STV electoral system as recommended by the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform?

A majority (981,419 – 57.69 per cent) voted yes but it fell short of the referendum’s approval conditions. A second referendum was held on May 12, 2009. The essence of the question was identical to the 2005 question, but the wording and presentation were profoundly changed:

Which electoral system should British Columbia use to elect members to the provincial Legislative Assembly?

The existing electoral system (First-Past-the Post).

The single transferable vote electoral system (BC-STV) proposed by the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform.

The majority (971,353 – 60.91 percent) voted for the First-Past-the-Post system.

Not only the wording and presentation were changed for the 2009 vote, so was the voting process. The 2005 referendum used polling stations; the 2009 referendum used mail-in ballots. A March 2009 Angus Reid Poll showed a 65 percent support for BC-STV, but it also showed that a mere 44 percent were aware of the pending referendum. More citizens voted to adopt a new voting system in 2005 than voted to retain the existing one in 2009!

The provincial government has issued a questionnaire concerning the form and substance of the electoral reform referendum to be held in the fall. The questionnaire can be accessed at engage.gov.bc.ca/howwevote. Your responses to the questionnaire will help validate the referendum results by reducing the risk of skulduggeries with the ballot’s question(s) and ensuring fairness in the voting process. The deadline is February 28, 2018, don’t miss it!

Just Posted

SAR leads helicopter Family Day rescue to retrieve injured climber

Pilot had to hover over waterfall as rescue team lifted two people to safety

Security guard now on patrol at three Terrace banks

Company hired to secure ATM vestibules due to safety concerns

City of Terrace to participate in provincial electronic vehicle network

City will purchase two charging stations worth up to $10K

Professor advocates for change in conversation for transgender youth

Ann Travers wrote a book based on five years of interviews with trans kids and their parents

Broken axle caused New Hazelton train derailment: TSB

It could happen again without a different way to inspect trains

Fashion Fridays: Must have wardrobe basics

Kim XO, helps to keep you looking good on Fashion Fridays on the Black Press Media Network

Skier dies at Revelstoke Mountain Resort

Cause of death for young man has not been released

R. Kelly charged with 10 counts of sexual abuse

R&B star has been accused of sexual misconduct involving women and underage girls for years

More sailings coming to 10 BC Ferries’ routes

Transportation Minister Claire Trevena said the sailings were originally cut in 2014

National Energy Board approves Trans Mountain pipeline again

Next step includes cabinet voting on the controversial expansion

Cryptocurrency exchange CEO who suddenly died leaves Kelowna house in will

Gerald Cotten, holding the keys to money tied up in his virtual currency exchange, died in December.

Regulator’s report, coming today, unlikely to settle Trans Mountain pipeline battle

The Trans Mountain pipeline will remain a controversial topic both in the political ring and out

Australian woman killed in avalanche at Whistler

The woman and her partner were reportedly rescued by ski patrol, but she did not survive

Most Read